![]() The head of a movie studio doesn't answer to the MPAA he rarely even interfaces with the MPAA (if at all). It doesn't set any grand, strategic agendas within the industry itself. (Extremely fat, lavishly well fed cats, who have no individual incentives to be herded.) The MPAA seems large and monolithic, but it's basically a lobbying organization. When we say "Hollywood should just do X," we're talking about herding cats. It's an industry full of competing companies with conflicting agendas. Secondarily, because "Hollywood" isn't a single entity. ![]() Primarily, because nobody has any idea where it needs to be moved to. The problem for Hollywood is that "moving the trash can" is extremely hard. But even at its peak, piracy wasn't hurting movies the way it was hurting music. To some extent, that's because the movie business has been very good at stomping out piracy (at least among mainstream, non-tech-savvy consumers). It's even more apt when you look at the numbers and see that piracy isn't hurting the top or bottom line for the movie business to any appreciable degree. To this day, Marco's analogy is one of the simplest, most creative, and best I've ever read on this topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |